Image captions for portrait images
To accompany my final portrait images I thought it would be
a good idea to create some extended image captions, similar to the style of
Edward Burtynsky. Burtynsky often reflected on his personal thoughts of a
scene, along with facts and things of interest related to the area in question.
Doing this adds an extra dynamic to the image and can influence the spectators’
perception and thoughts regarding the subject. While I won’t be handing a
physical copy of this in with the images come deadline day, this is a perfect
accompaniment for the images when I exhibit them at the end of the level 6
year.
Kielder water:
Kielder Water and its forest surroundings are completely man
made, the successor of land that was once used for farming, a school and a
railway. The way that the positive and negative effects of the construction of
the dam are perceived and dealt with shows us how our priorities have developed
for our need of power and its security. While the reservoir produces an average
of 20,000 MWh of electricity per year, which is a considerable amount of clean
energy, the landscape of the river downstream is altered for ever. The change
in temperature near the base of the dam and the increased metal content of the
water throughout the river makes it difficult for the salmon to dig their
spawning redds and also for Black Fly and Mayfly larva to attach themselves to
the rocks which effects the wider environment, not just the river ecosystem.
Teesside Industrial Park (Huntsman Tioxide):
The reality of this scene is a contradiction of what our
first impressions would lead us to believe. The long pipes and industry in the
background potentially make us conclude that we’ve invaded this landscape with
our industry and our expansive nature. However in reality, the image is created
in a scene where nature and industries relationship is an improving one,
despite the reputation of tees valley area. The number of seal pups sighted in
the area had been rising consistently over the last five years. In 2013 there were 22 healthy pups which is
the highest recorded number in a single breeding season. This all points to a
healthier River Tees, a vital resource for both industry and
Melton Bottom chalk quarry (Omya)
The Melton bottom chalk quarry extracts and processes Chalk
(calcium carbonate) to produce a range of products that are used in a variety of
industrial applications. The amount of earth moved within this operation is
testament to the quality of the ground, but also our desire to capitalise on
varying resources despite the amount of effort and money used to do so. Ironically the south section of the quarry is
now a protected ecological site; this almost doesn’t make sense. It could be
said that as a society in some circumstances we are capable of prioritising the
wider environment over economic gain, but in others, for example larger scale
projects we still don’t see environmental protection as priority. Perhaps this needs to change if we want to
ensure the best possible future.
Drax power station:
Drax power station is a symbol of the UK’s status as one of
Western Europe’s largest energy producers through coal. I has been recorded to burn around 30,000
tonnes of coal a day which makes 4,000MW (7% of the UK’s needs). But it could also
be seen as a symbol of the UK’s primary contribution to the global warming
issue. Drax was built with the intention of using local coal from the rich
supply that would have been the Selby Coalfields however it was shut down. This
meant that over half the coal supply came from South Africa and Eastern Europe,
and it continues to do so. The plant is the UK’s largest emitter of CO2, about
22m tonnes a year, the equivalent to the whole of Sweden’s emissions plus a bit
more. Drax intends by 2016 to have 3 of its 6 units running on biomass, claiming
that this is a cleaner more efficient method of energy production. Drax’s
biomass fuelled furnaces produce three percent more CO2 than coal and this is
before the biomass pellets are transported from America and Canada (a 3,800
mile trip). Taking this into consideration biomass produces 20 percent more
greenhouse gas emission than coal.




No comments:
Post a Comment